🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's youth". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," said a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.